The Verdict is about analysis of my players based on their score, combined with their underlying stats (credit to ShotsonTarget) from a particular Gameweek.
This section was actually quite tricky to make because players brought in have expectations about them, highlighted by their projected score. Since this is part of the personal record, there will be 2 tables to deliver the verdict on these players. The first table will be the underlying stats for each player based on their individual games.
Based on these stats, their actual score is compared to their projected score, and based on their stats a Verdict is given.
Projected Score
|
Actual Score
|
Stats
|
Verdict
|
Good
|
Good
|
Good
|
Deliver
|
Good
|
Bad
|
Good
|
Unlucky
|
Good
|
Good
|
Bad
|
Lucky
|
Good
|
Bad
|
Bad
|
Flop
|
Bad
|
Good
|
Good
|
Gem
|
Bad
|
Bad
|
Good
|
Unlucky
|
Bad
|
Good
|
Bad
|
Lucky
|
Bad
|
Bad
|
Bad
|
Expected
|
The rule is to keep the Delivers and the Gems, Monitor the Lucky and the Unlucky, and drop the Flops.
Player
|
Price
|
Minutes
|
Key Passes
|
Shots
|
Shots in the box
|
Shots on Target
|
Assists
|
Goals
|
Turner
|
4.2
|
94
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
Enrique
|
6.0
| 94 |
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
| 0 |
0
|
Zabaleta
| 6.2 |
93
|
0
|
1
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
Mata
|
9.5
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
Walcott
|
8.8
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
Cazorla
| 9.6 |
94
|
2
|
6
|
5
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
Bale
|
10.9
|
96
|
1
|
6
|
3
|
3
|
1
|
1
|
RVP
|
13.6
|
97
|
1
|
7
| 6 |
4
|
0
|
0
|
Suarez
|
11.2
|
94
|
3
|
9
|
8
|
4
|
0
|
0
|
Benteke
|
7.2
|
94
|
0
| 3 |
2
|
2
|
0
|
1
|
Jenas
| 4.2 |
96
|
0
|
3
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
Wilson
|
3.9
|
94
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
Clyne
|
4.2
|
95
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
Player
|
Projected Score
|
Actual Score
|
Stats
|
Verdict
|
De Gea
|
6
|
6
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
Zabaleta
|
6
|
6
|
Bad
|
Lucky
|
Enrique
|
2
|
2
|
Bad
|
Expected
|
Turner
|
2
|
2
|
Bad
|
Expected
|
Mata
| 2 (4) |
0
|
N/A
|
Not Playing
|
Cazorla
|
6
|
12
|
Good
|
Deliver
|
Walcott
|
0
|
0
|
N/A
|
Injured
|
Bale
|
6
|
13
|
Good
|
Deliver
|
RVP
|
6
|
7
|
Good
|
Deliver
|
Suarez
|
6
|
6
|
Good
|
Deliver
|
Benteke
|
2 (4)
|
6
|
Good
|
Gem
|
Boruc
|
2
|
1
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
Jenas
|
2
|
2
|
Bad
|
Expected
|
Wilson
|
2
|
2
|
Bad
|
Expected
|
Clyne
|
2
|
2
|
Bad
|
Expected
|
Delivers: Cazorla, Bale, RVP, Suarez
Unlucky: -
Lucky: Zabaleta
Expecteds: Enrique, Turner, Jenas, Wilson, Clyne
Flops: Suarez, Walcott
Not Playing/Injured: Mata, Walcott
Gem: Benteke
Conclusion: 64 points from an expected 40 plus is a pretty good haul. All the big hitters THAT PLAYED delivered. Would have been interesting if I managed to have say, Silva and Michu playing instead of Walcott and Mata. A severely more diverse team would've easily scored in and around the 80s and while I am semi-satisfied, this Gameweek saw me gaining a satisfactory 50k places among dead teams, which is progress that I have to harshly call a lost opportunity.
Since I'm not able to do Watchlists this week, I'll just touch quickly on those that delivered this week. Strange thing about this week is that almost all the usual suspects delivered.
RVP, Caz, Bale, Suarez, Baines (CS), Berba, Silva, Tevez, and Michu all delivered,
while punts such as
Kone, Carroll, Lukaku, Lambert, Remy, Mirallas, Giroud, Agbonlahor and Gerrard
all got offensive returns. What is really pleasing to see that anyone who HAS been keeping up with the game would have at least got something in return (compared to the dead teams who have Hazard and Torres say). Having said that, a very odd observation is that almost whatever 3 forwards put out this week would've profited (bar Rooney, where you'd be considered really unlucky really) and the midfield is where the punts really would've gained ground. Silva and Gerrard were the only real standouts here, and while owning Caz and Bale would've given you a good "core" score, owning Silva and Gerrard, on top of whatever cheap forwards would have launched you really, really high up.
To monitor: I give up. Quite literally. Thankfully I'm doing the Verdict after finding out Bale is injured. Imagine if I sent Mata out before the Europa League games.
No comments:
Post a Comment