I have my first guest article! Many thanks to Ameenkw for writing this up, this article will be up on the Guest Column Archive and I hope that this will be the start of many :D
The Fellaini Dilemma
Fellaini was definitely the name that was
mentioned the most in all FPL forums and chats this week. After a few
impressive weeks (GW11, 12, 14, 15), his ownership had reached around 47%. As a
consequence of his headbutt incident this week, not surprisingly, Fellaini got
banned for 3 weeks. This shouldn’t be a surprise since Fellaini is the player
with the most fouls committed in EPL this season, and this act is predictable
from him.
However, we are not here to discuss his
behavior. What we care about as FPL managers is the fact that Fellaini will be
out for 3 weeks. This is a long-term suspension, and removing Fellaini is the
obvious solution. The real question is who do we get to replace him? This
article will discuss the different alternatives, by looking across the
different ranges of players.
Favorable Fixtures
One
of the first factors to consider when shopping as an FPL manager, are a
player’s fixtures. With the January Wildcard being soon, we will use the next
4-5 Gameweeks’ fixtures to make our choices.
Picking out good and bad fixtures can
generally be done by looking at the form and H/A, but I won’t discuss my
methodology of determining that in this article, perhaps in an upcoming one. Let’s
assume that the teams with the best fixtures (as most of us are aware of) are: Arsenal, Tottenham, Man City, Liverpool and
Chelsea.
Arsenal: In form but inconsistent
We’ll
start by looking at Arsenal. In terms of FPL, the team has not been consistent
this season, however by looking at their midfield, the player that stands out
is definitely Cazorla. He’s ranked 3rd at the moment in terms of
total points (after RVP and Michu), and he just had an awesome week, scoring an
extraordinary 23 points. He seems to be in
good shape and with these favorable fixtures he might be the best pick.
The only problem is the extra cash needed,
since you need to have around 2.0M to get him for Fellaini. Another thing you’d
notice is that he’s not a consistent performer, and thus you’ll need to be
patient when you get him. Other options include Walcott and Arteta, and they are a bit cheaper but inconsistent as
well. Walcott is injury prone, but he’s a
good short-term choice especially since he’s playing as a striker. Arteta
is an option if you are short of cash. However, you can get better player at
the same price (unless you are willing to wait for penalties!).
Tottenham: Wait on Bale, but Lennon and Dempsey are
possible punts
The second team is Tottenham. The first
player that comes to mind is Bale. He’s an impressive midfielder and he’s the
top scorer for Tottenham (despite the fact that he missed 3 games!). The
problem is that he’s injured and getting him at the moment is not the best
option. You might want to wait on
that.
The second option is Lennon. Looking at his
points, you can easily see he’s not a point magnet. However, at 7.0, he’s
considered to be cheap and with the easy fixtures coming up, he might be
Tottenham’s main man. The last option (for the gamblers!) is Dempsey. He was
part of the Dream Team last year when he delivered 209 points (more than Bale
himself). However, since he is not used to playing at Tottenham yet, you can try him out if you are a risk taker,
and/or if you have the extra cash.
Manchester City: Toure’s form versus Silva’s class
City
is the last team I’ll discuss in detail. The first option to look at is Yaya
Toure. He has missed only 7 minutes this season and he has got 80 points to his
name so far. He’s a definite starter for Mancini, and rotation is not a concern
at all. If you looked at his points, you’ll find that he delivers in
consecutive weeks (the first 3 for example).
However, he has some “dry” weeks where he
does nothing when he plays. He delivered in his last 2 weeks, and against
Reading next week he might be your best call. At 7.7, his price is considered low for his points obtained so far.
The second option is David Silva. Despite
the fact that he’s at 9.4, Silva has not found his form yet. He’s not
consistent at all, and he’s scoring very few points. However, class is
permanent, and players like these can find their form at any point. In the next
few weeks, Silva might do that and
deliver like crazy.
The last option is for gamblers again.
Nasri in no point this season was able to do well, except in a few matches here
and there. Other than that, the 2’s and 1’s were all he had. However, things
might turn around in this game. At 8.0, he might be your differential that will
pull you up!
Chelsea & Liverpool: Chelsea’s Consistent Quality but
Pool’s Inconsistent and risky as well
The
other two teams are Chelsea and Liverpool. If you are looking at Chelsea’s MIDs,
you can’t look at anyone other than Hazard and Mata, who are both quality
midfielders that deliver consistently (6.2 PPG for Mata and 5.6 for Hazard). You
would need 2M in the bank to get 1 of the 2, but they do seem worth it.
If you turn to Liverpool, Gerrard and
Sterling are your only 2 options. Gerrard hasn’t been an amazing player this
season, and it’s a risk to get him.
Your other option, Sterling is very cheap at 5.7. He’s not a consistent player,
but saving up the cash might help you elsewhere. Keep in mind that Sterling is
a rotation risk at the moment, and you might
want to avoid him.
Conclusion
Deciding
which player to buy might be a difficult task. The first thing to think of is
whether you actually have cover
from those teams or not. If you do, then you might not want to double up that cover.
The other factor is the money you have in
the bank, and whether you are willing to spend
the extra 2M for a mid or not. In my opinion, which you are more than
welcome to criticize, my first option is Mata.
If you have the money, then go for him. He’s an amazing player, and with
Chelseas’s fixtures he might do very well.
If you don’t any money to spend, then it’s Yaya. At 7.7, and with City’s
fixtures, he’s a great player, and he might prove more than useful. If you are
concerned about the cash, Lennon
is your best bet, and he might serve you well.
Mary had a little lamb
Mary had a little lamb
No comments:
Post a Comment